wellsley
Senior Poster
Posts:5999
 |
| 17 Jan 2010 01:13 PM |
|
Lake Champlain is one of the greatest fisheries in north america for years now. It has been fighting a lamprey eel problem for sometime. Below is a link to a petition to keep the use of lampricide going. Please read the petition and sign it if you agree. Thank you. http://www.petitiononline.com/Lewis...ition.html |
|
| Lifemember & Bushwacker
SMF |
|
|
Bassbum
Veteran Poster
Posts:1733
 |
| 17 Jan 2010 01:43 PM |
|
I'm number 412. Doesn't seem like sea lamprey serves a helpful purpose in the lake. Lifer since 05/08....Ky....Fred |
|
| Fred |
|
|
Pegsguy
Veteran Poster
Posts:4094
 |
| 17 Jan 2010 03:00 PM |
|
The Great Lakes have had a lamprey problem since the opening of the St Laurence seaway in the '50s. The lampreys decimated the lake trout population and it is just now starting to recover due to aggressive lamprey control efforts. Hope things work out for Lk. Champlain. Tom Fishin' fool in NE Illinois |
|
| Lifer in NE Illinois Gen. 1:28 I didn't rise to the top of the food chain to become a vegitarian! |
|
|
bass or bass?
Veteran Poster
Posts:1578
 |
| 17 Jan 2010 04:39 PM |
|
Best of luck. That sure is a beautiful lake and area. Was only there once, but really enjoyed it. Phoenix Arizona
~N.A.F.C.~B.A.S.S.~BoatU.S.~N.R.A.~ |
|
| Phoenix Arizona
~Outdoor-Fishing~N.A.F.C.~B.A.S.S.~BoatU.S.~N.R.A.~A.M.A.~ |
|
|
ERABBIT
Veteran Poster
Posts:2286
 |
| 18 Jan 2010 04:48 PM |
|
Frank would you still put your name on that if you lived along that stream ???? There are other ways to control them and some of the "lampricide " being used maybe the reason the rainbow smelt are nearly gone in Seneca. I'm just saying ......................hope they are making the right choice.  |
|
Ed
 |
|
|
fishing-eagle
Advanced Poster
Posts:345
 |
| 18 Jan 2010 05:58 PM |
|
They have been using the lampicide for many years on the rivers and tributaries of Lake Champlain and we still have smelt in the lake. I have been fishing the waters of Lake Champlain most my life and I have seen the decline of the fisheries due to the lamprey eel. I have caught lake trout, salmon, walleye and other fish that are near death due to the lamprey sucking the life blood out of them. Many times the eel are still attached. The Walleye fisheries have been almost completly deystroyed since the 70s and much of that is due to the lamprey. I vote for the lampricide use. If NY state & Vermont would both work on the problem together instead of fighting each other, they would have possibly eradicated the lamprey eel population by now. Everytime they start getting control of things... one state or the other stops spending the $ to complete the lampricide and the problem increases again. Lake Champlain is not a pond or small lake and the invasives must be controlled. All us fishermen can do our part by following good fishing practices such as cleaning our trailers and being super careful not to allow invasives to be released from our boats or livewells. . Rabbit I vote for using lampricide and I do live in the area and fish Lake Champlain as one of my two home lakes. We have only seen positive results of its use in the past or more positive than negative results. |
|
|
|
|
ERABBIT
Veteran Poster
Posts:2286
 |
| 18 Jan 2010 07:44 PM |
|
http://www.dec.ny.gov/animals/6998.html What is happening and has happen on (Quote you) "this pond or small lake" now may be what you will see later. Or showing up some now ????? http://www.denpubs.com/Articles-c-2..._gone.html " The use of TFM, which is intended to control larval lamprey, is likely to kill amphibians wherever it is used in Lake Erie tributaries. Deformity rates in mudpuppies at Long Point and in the Detroit River are elevated well above the background rates reported for inland areas of the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River basin." from: http://www.fluoridealert.org/pestic...tracts.htm as before I'm just saying..............it's just that the DEC said as like you "They have been using the lampicide for many years on the rivers and tributaries of Lake Champlain and we still have smelt in the lake." in a way that it can't hurt ya but then why post and report about not drinking the water or eating the fish if it can't hurt ya. Don't read what I said the WRONG way I'm all for lamprey control but the less TFM lampicide used the better. Oh and any time you want to bring your "ultimate fishing machine" over to this "pond"(Seneca Lake) and show us what ya got I'll have my lil'-tin-lizy ready to try and stay with ya............ http://photobucket.com" target="_blank">  |
|
Ed
 |
|
|
EricRidenour
Advanced Poster
Posts:433
 |
| 18 Jan 2010 07:54 PM |
|
418. Eric Ridenour  |
|
Big Ez World.com Fishin', Friends, and Home of The Charlie Hall Memorial Classic!
Lookin' for a REAL Fishin' Message forum? Where Membership is FREE? Where folks actually talk about fishin'? Come see us ;) |
|
|
EricRidenour
Advanced Poster
Posts:433
 |
| 18 Jan 2010 08:03 PM |
|
I hope I did that right let me know if it didn't go threw.
My Blog
Life Member 02' |
|
Big Ez World.com Fishin', Friends, and Home of The Charlie Hall Memorial Classic!
Lookin' for a REAL Fishin' Message forum? Where Membership is FREE? Where folks actually talk about fishin'? Come see us ;) |
|
|
fishing-eagle
Advanced Poster
Posts:345
 |
| 19 Jan 2010 02:09 PM |
|
Well again I still have to vote TFM lampricide because we need to save the fisheries on Lake Champlain. As far as them telling us not to drink the water when they treat it... the state or any goverment agency is going to tell you that just so the can do a CYA and protect themselves from lawsuits. Have you ever read most of the MSD sheets that now come with any chemical of any kind. Your not supposed to drink your bath water either. . Yes I rather they use minium chemicals in any of our waterways. I want to protect all our waters and all wildlife. The TFM may have some ill effect on some aquatic life; but, if the lamprey get out of control, it won't matter anymore. If we lose all our Lake Trout, Salmon, Walleye and other fish species in Lake Champlain due to the lamprey eels, then it won't matter. We won't need smelt or other aquatic life to support the lake and our fish to feed on. . As far as the smelt population goes on Lake George, Lake Champlain and other lakes in the Adirondacks... the biologist can't figure out the cause of decline in some areas. They think the smelt is like other things... they run in cycles of good reproduction and poor cycles. They are also looking into things like where the smelt run and reasons such as they can no longer get up some streams or brooks to reproduce due to human beings causing problems such as barriers in the streams. . Erabbit I am not arguing the point here of using TFM with you. I think you and I are both on the same track and are concerned fishermen. We both want the best to help the lakes and fisheries. This is a subject that deserves some debate and scientific investigation. |
|
|
|
|
bigbarry
 |
| 20 Jan 2010 07:26 AM |
|
I'M NUMBER 431 |
|
|
|
|
fishing-eagle
Advanced Poster
Posts:345
 |
| 20 Jan 2010 09:42 AM |
|
I signed the petiton some time ago. I am #178 and my lovely wife is #179. We enjoy fishing Lake Champlain and also having a nice fresh trout or salmon dinner. We really appreciate a fresh Walleye fillet if we can catch one but they are fairly rare in recent years. |
|
|
|
|
turnip
Senior Poster
Posts:5638
 |
| 20 Jan 2010 10:01 AM |
|
I am number 432! LM since 2005 Bushwacker Deputy Sherif
from S.E. Pa. |
|
| Lifer since 2005, "Bushwacker" deputy sherif, S. E. Pa |
|
|
ERABBIT
Veteran Poster
Posts:2286
 |
| 20 Jan 2010 06:01 PM |
|
I didn't put my name on the petition because of the Lewis Creek deal ,it just didn't sound right. So I did more checking and I found that the laketrout stocked in Champlain come from my pond(Seneca Lake). I was aware that years ago Lake Michigan was stocked with Seneca fish when the lamprey did all the damage to there laketrout and a few other lakes. I also found research on Lewis Creek , it was treated with TMF lampricides and another was not. The lamprey that survived out of Lewis Creek were larger , weighted more than the untreated stream. (so they would/could do more damage ???) I didn't get that it would but makes you wonder !!!!!!! I also found that the lamprey live most of there lives in the streams and I think it said the last year in the lake. While in the lake on most creel reports they (lamprey) target the larger fish. The Seneca strain seem to withstand the assault better than others is what I have read before. This time the Champlain folks seem to think it because they prefer deeper water. I fish them all the time and have found them in much shallower water than they reported but our smelt are little to none where you (at this time) have a good amount and smelt like colder water than the sawbellies that Seneca laketrout chase..........anyway getting some what off base the next two reports I found " TFM isn’t perfect. It affects a number of non-target organisms in addition to larval lampreys. Some of these non-target species, including several freshwater mussel species, at least one fish species, a rare lamprey species, and the largest Vermont amphibian, the mudpuppy, are threatened or of special concern in Vermont. " Walt when I'm done drinking the bath water I don't dump it in the lake. I was wondering what the "at least one fish species" was......found this : Lampricide From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Lampricide is a chemical which is designed to target the larvae of Lampreys in river systems before their recruitment as parasitic adults. TFM ( 3-trifluoromethyl-4-nitrophenol) is one such chemical [1] While effective in that it typically doesn't harm other fish due to the evolutionary relationship between true fish and lampreys, lampricides can be problematic for amphibians such as mudpuppies (genus Necturus) which often share the same habitats. Also, some more "primitive" species of fish, such as the Sturgeon in the Great Lakes are sensitive to chemicals such as TFM. Maybe some sturgeon have been spotted in Lewis Creek and Vt. thinks they more important ???? I don't know!!!!. Now back to the petition when I was reading the names on there and there comments along with checking some forums it sounds like they (Vt. and N.Y) are doing a very good job making the fishing better and controlling the lamprey. The research I did would lead me to think the Lewis Creek is due for treatment again but if the DEC/DNR of Vt. thinks it's not the right time wouldn't be better to listen to them ???? Oh I also wrote Senator Leahy asking about the moneys for the control of the lamprey. (if they got the funding they need and if I could help in any way by contacting my states for his support)........... sorry for being so loooonnnngggg winded !!!!!!! Again I'm all for lamprey control but also controlling the TMF put into the ecosystem at the same time.Oh I found a number of possible reasons for not treating Lewis Creek but nothing saying they were NOT going too. I still don't understand what got this petition started in the first place ????? I'm going to put my name on it but agree with the state as to when to use or NOT use TMF. fishing-eagle wrote: Well again I still have to vote TFM lampricide because we need to save the fisheries on Lake Champlain. As far as them telling us not to drink the water when they treat it... the state or any goverment agency is going to tell you that just so the can do a CYA and protect themselves from lawsuits. Have you ever read most of the MSD sheets that now come with any chemical of any kind. Your not supposed to drink your bath water either. . Yes I rather they use minium chemicals in any of our waterways. I want to protect all our waters and all wildlife. The TFM may have some ill effect on some aquatic life; but, if the lamprey get out of control, it won't matter anymore. If we lose all our Lake Trout, Salmon, Walleye and other fish species in Lake Champlain due to the lamprey eels, then it won't matter. We won't need smelt or other aquatic life to support the lake and our fish to feed on. . As far as the smelt population goes on Lake George, Lake Champlain and other lakes in the Adirondacks... the biologist can't figure out the cause of decline in some areas. They think the smelt is like other things... they run in cycles of good reproduction and poor cycles. They are also looking into things like where the smelt run and reasons such as they can no longer get up some streams or brooks to reproduce due to human beings causing problems such as barriers in the streams. . Erabbit I am not arguing the point here of using TFM with you. I think you and I are both on the same track and are concerned fishermen. We both want the best to help the lakes and fisheries. This is a subject that deserves some debate and scientific investigation.  |
|
Ed
 |
|
|
turnip
Senior Poster
Posts:5638
 |
| 20 Jan 2010 08:28 PM |
|
Signing this petition takes a whole lot more thought and research than I realized....Every time I caught a fish with lamprey marks or there was one hanging on the fish, it kind a made me angry...And I guess I signed more out of emotion than being informed. Thanks Ed for your research...wow! LM since 2005 Bushwacker Deputy Sherif
from S.E. Pa. |
|
| Lifer since 2005, "Bushwacker" deputy sherif, S. E. Pa |
|
|
Pegsguy
Veteran Poster
Posts:4094
 |
| 20 Jan 2010 09:30 PM |
|
The lamprey did so much damage in Lk. Mich that it is still feeling the effects. When the lake trout crashed, the lake became overrun by alewife. To control the alewife salmon and trout (steelhead and brown as well as the Seneca lakers) were introduced. There are many who believe that the non-natives are at least partly responsible for the decline of the lake perch, along with commercial overharvest. After all that, we still have lamprey. I wish you Lake Champlain guys the best. It will be interesting to see how the latest crises (zebra and quagga mussels, goby and now asian carp) play out. Tom Fishin' fool in NE Illinois |
|
| Lifer in NE Illinois Gen. 1:28 I didn't rise to the top of the food chain to become a vegitarian! |
|
|
wellsley
Senior Poster
Posts:5999
 |
| 21 Jan 2010 01:46 PM |
|
I believe that the Lake Champlain Anglers Association is responsible for the petition. And I think the reason behind this is to show the state of Vermont that there is support for their efforts. In the past there have been groups trying to stop the use of Lampricide. I agree with erabbit just to dump this stuff in any and all waters is not wise. Controled use by the state professionals should be the only way this stuff is used and regulated. |
|
| Lifemember & Bushwacker
SMF |
|
|
diojisdad
Veteran Poster
Posts:1794
 |
| 21 Jan 2010 04:14 PM |
|
# 437 "it doesn't matter if the horse is blind....Just load the cart anyway!!!" John Madden NFL Hall Of Fame) Fred Jefferson,MD (NAFC LM) (NAHC TLM) |
|
| " It doesn't matter if the horse is blind, Just load the cart anyway!!" (John Madden)
(NAFC TLM), (NAHC TLM), (NRA)
FRED FROM MARYLAND |
|
|
ERABBIT
Veteran Poster
Posts:2286
 |
| 21 Jan 2010 04:23 PM |
|
Pegsguy , the zebra have had a + on Seneca Lake. It the 70's and 80's tons of slit covered the gravel spawning beds in the 100'+ water that the lakers spawn on. Then with years of the zebra beds blanketing the lake bottom and building the lakers have places to spawn again.................now I could write down 5- things also but this is a BIG + for the lakers on this lake................ Pegsguy wrote: It will be interesting to see how the latest crises (zebra and quagga mussels, goby and now asian carp) play out. Tom Fishin' fool in NE Illinois  |
|
Ed
 |
|
|
Pegsguy
Veteran Poster
Posts:4094
 |
| 21 Jan 2010 06:33 PM |
|
Erabbit: Glad you got some benefit out of the zebras. Lk Mich is also seeing some good come out of them. The water off the Il. shore is now clear enough to allow weeds to grow and as a result we now have smallmouth and pike in the area. Some walleye have also been caught but don't tell the IDNR, they say Lk Mich won't support walleye this far south! Tom Fishin' fool in NE Illinois |
|
| Lifer in NE Illinois Gen. 1:28 I didn't rise to the top of the food chain to become a vegitarian! |
|
|
turnip
Senior Poster
Posts:5638
 |
| 17 Feb 2012 01:32 PM |
|
Can anyone up-date this? Perhaps there is new info or more info that could be added...Just say'in! |
|
| Lifer since 2005, "Bushwacker" deputy sherif, S. E. Pa |
|
|
wellsley
Senior Poster
Posts:5999
 |
| 17 Feb 2012 03:18 PM |
|
2012 petition should be up soon. |
|
| Lifemember & Bushwacker
SMF |
|
|
wellsley
Senior Poster
Posts:5999
 |
| 20 Feb 2012 08:23 AM |
|
|
|
| Lifemember & Bushwacker
SMF |
|
|
wellsley
Senior Poster
Posts:5999
 |
| 20 Feb 2012 08:43 AM |
|
http://www.glfc.org/pubs/FACT_4.pdf
Is TFM Safe to Organisms
Other than Sea Lampreys?
Exhaustive laboratory tests—more than 40 years’
worth—show that at the dose needed to eliminate
sea lampreys, TFM is nontoxic or has minimal
effects on aquatic plants, other fish, and wildlife.
The impact on non-target species can be reduced
by closely controlling the concentration of TFM
applied and by applying TFM during the right season
(after the spawning run, for instance). Studies
have also shown TFM to be nontoxic to humans
and other mammals. This compound is registered
as a lampricide by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency and Agriculture Canada and has
met or surpassed all criteria for application in Great
Lakes streams.
|
|
| Lifemember & Bushwacker
SMF |
|
|