ramseyetcs
Advanced Poster
Posts:310
 |
| 04 Jan 2011 01:40 PM |
|
Can anyone compare a ultra-light or light multi-piece (3pc or more as opposed to a 2pc) rod to a "telescoping rod" I am thinking about getting one to keep in the car, in addition to short single piece or a 6 ft + two piece. |
|
| Paul, S-Eastern CT, Retired USNR/USN, American Legion, NERA Life Member, MDA/UAW |
|
|
skewl
Veteran Poster
Posts:1014
 |
| 04 Jan 2011 07:01 PM |
|
I don't have a 3+ piece rod, but I do own 2 telescoping rods that I love and can take almost everywhere. One issue with a telescoping rod is that if you pull too hard when you're opening, the segments might get stuck like that (one of mine did, no big deal, but it does take some of the convenience away) Also, I would assume that a telescoping rod would be safer to transport and be less likely to break because all of the sections stay together. |
|
|
|
|
catmandu
Veteran Poster
Posts:3164
 |
| 05 Jan 2011 08:55 AM |
|
I have a Diawa Executive Travel Pack, has a 6 or 7 piece rod and a spinning reel all in a plastic case, its pretty sweet get up and wasnt to expensive if I remember, think I got it from Cabelas. |
|
NAFC Life Member 2001
NAHC Life Member 2005 |
|
|
Pegsguy
Veteran Poster
Posts:4106
 |
| 05 Jan 2011 12:26 PM |
|
My travel/emergency rod is a telescoping Zebco spincast rig. While I am not much of a spincast fan it does store nicely in the trunk of the wife's car (no complaints from her) and is quick to set up with no missing pieces. The plastic case does a nice job of protecting it also. Tom |
|
| Lifer in NE Illinois Gen. 1:28 I didn't rise to the top of the food chain to become a vegitarian! |
|
|
mr bill
Veteran Poster
Posts:1903
 |
| 10 Jan 2011 09:47 AM |
|
i believe for fishing purposes the telescoping rod is the better rod to use. because of the fact that there is not any furrels to take away the feel of the action from the rod. both rods store nicely, both have storage packs both rods work to hold line, cast and reel in line both will catch fish when handle properly the only thing that is lost is that sensitivity of one's rod. the more sections there is the less sensitive a rod is. each spot that a rod comes together is a stiff spot and you loss some of the sensitivity in those spots. |
|
|
|
|
ramseyetcs
Advanced Poster
Posts:310
 |
| 10 Jan 2011 05:50 PM |
|
Thanks for all the advice. I split the difference and got a 6', 6 section (+ handle) telescoping medium rod (w/reel) and a 5', 2 pc ultra-lite to replace the 4' 6", 1 pc I broke last fall. Go ahead and criticize, I can take it.  |
|
| Paul, S-Eastern CT, Retired USNR/USN, American Legion, NERA Life Member, MDA/UAW |
|
|
pillman
Veteran Poster
Posts:1589
 |
| 11 Jan 2011 07:52 AM |
|
I got a 5'6" ultralight that used to be 6' til someone stepped on it on the boat. still works fine |
|
|
|
|
bpetersen
Veteran Poster
Posts:1254
 |
| 14 Jan 2011 01:00 PM |
|
I have a preference for the older Wright and Mgill ( eagle claw) pack rods. These came in aluminum rod tube that will fit nicely u=in a backpack or under your seat. The ones I have are both spin/fly combos. one is 6'6" and the other 7'6". these are more a medium action rod and they say for 7wt fly line. thats a bit heavy for the type of fishing I do but a 6 wt seems to load the rod pretty good. these do not have fast action tips. The work ok for fly fishing in a pinch. but I do enjoy the extra lenth when fishing some of the streams I go to. Brian |
|
| Fishing: The art of loitering in or near a body of water.
Utah fisherman. lifer since 99 |
|
|
bpetersen
Veteran Poster
Posts:1254
 |
| 14 Jan 2011 01:01 PM |
|
I have a preference for the older Wright and Mgill ( eagle claw) pack rods. These came in aluminum rod tube that will fit nicely u=in a backpack or under your seat. The ones I have are both spin/fly combos. one is 6'6" and the other 7'6". these are more a medium action rod and they say for 7wt fly line. thats a bit heavy for the type of fishing I do but a 6 wt seems to load the rod pretty good. these do not have fast action tips. The work ok for fly fishing in a pinch. but I do enjoy the extra lenth when fishing some of the streams I go to. Brian |
|
| Fishing: The art of loitering in or near a body of water.
Utah fisherman. lifer since 99 |
|
|
bpetersen
Veteran Poster
Posts:1254
 |
| 14 Jan 2011 01:02 PM |
|
I have a preference for the older Wright and Mgill ( eagle claw) pack rods. These came in aluminum rod tube that will fit nicely u=in a backpack or under your seat. The ones I have are both spin/fly combos. one is 6'6" and the other 7'6". these are more a medium action rod and they say for 7wt fly line. thats a bit heavy for the type of fishing I do but a 6 wt seems to load the rod pretty good. these do not have fast action tips. The work ok for fly fishing in a pinch. but I do enjoy the extra lenth when fishing some of the streams I go to. Brian |
|
| Fishing: The art of loitering in or near a body of water.
Utah fisherman. lifer since 99 |
|
|